Perhaps interesting in of itself is some of the feedback posted to the author, in particular with regards to factual journalism (as opposed to "nonfactual" journalism – a term that should be contradictory, but in this day and age is practiced and received all too often). Factual journalism sounds redundant, but it appears that a distinction must be made.
Thursday, September 11, 2003
law, order and google
I read an interesting Canadian blog post that, in part, remarks on the Google reflex, highlighting how much some people (including myself) have become dependent on the internet for information.
Perhaps interesting in of itself is some of the feedback posted to the author, in particular with regards to factual journalism (as opposed to "nonfactual" journalism – a term that should be contradictory, but in this day and age is practiced and received all too often). Factual journalism sounds redundant, but it appears that a distinction must be made.
Perhaps interesting in of itself is some of the feedback posted to the author, in particular with regards to factual journalism (as opposed to "nonfactual" journalism – a term that should be contradictory, but in this day and age is practiced and received all too often). Factual journalism sounds redundant, but it appears that a distinction must be made.